Google agreed to pay $391.5 million and make changes to its user privacy controls as part of a settlement with a coalition of 40 state attorneys general. The coalition accused Google of misleading customers about location-tracking practices that informed ad targeting.
The deal represents the largest privacy settlement won by states in U.S. history. Even so, the payout amounts to a drop in the bucket for Google’s parent company Alphabet, which reported $13.9 billion in profit from the last quarter alone. In January, a smaller coalition of AGs sued Google over the location-tracking issue. And last month, Arizona attorney general Mark Brnovich won an $85 million settlement from Google over it.
State AGs had been working on this case since 2018, following an Associated Press report that found Google tracked users’ location data even when they explicitly turned off “Location History” tracking in Android or iOS settings. At the time, Google denied wrongdoing and maintained that users could further limit location-tracking services by turning off “Web and App Activity.” The AGs weren’t convinced, likely in part because Google’s in-house copy at the time told customers that “with Location History off, the places you go are no longer stored.”
A Google spokesperson told Protocol that the settlement was consistent with improvements made in recent years, and that the case involved “outdated product policies that we changed years ago.” As part of the settlement, Google will further clarify location-tracking disclosures beginning next year, The New York Times reports.
“The transparency requirements of this settlement will ensure that Google not only makes users aware of how their location data is being used, but also how to change their account settings if they wish to disable location-related account settings, delete the data collected and set data retention limits,” Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel wrote in a press release.
State AGs have had to compensate for a lack of online privacy regulation at the federal level. That may soon be changing, however, as Politico reported on Monday that a bipartisan group of lawmakers intends to push the American Data Privacy and Protection Act through in the lame duck session.
ADPPA includes provisions protecting user geolocation data, including its transfer to third parties. The bill leaves enforcement up to the FTC, state AGs, state privacy authorities, and the California Privacy Protection Agency.
Figures such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Reps. Fred Upton and Billy Long shared concerns over ADPPA preempting state legislation. ADPPA sets out to supersede the existing patchwork of state laws, but in so doing it could crystalize the legislative landscape and make it more difficult for relatively nimble state legislatures to respond to evolving technologies.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus ornare, est vitae fermentum pellentesque, risus nunc ultricies mauris, ac pharetra nibh dui sit amet nisi. Fusce eget tellus et elit luctus congue. Quisque fringilla molestie posuere. Vivamus ac diam ac nisl semper posuere. Proin id luctus nisl. Sed fringilla diam in velit lacinia, sit amet aliquam erat viverra. Sed quam nisi, posuere in dolor id, feugiat tristique ex. Nam nec ipsum porttitor, malesuada neque sed, pharetra tortor. Donec scelerisque ultrices tellus non feugiat. Aenean mi tellus, accumsan nec mauris facilisis, commodo viverra magna. Aenean sed sem dapibus, luctus mi quis, blandit eros. Quisque vestibulum, dui at dapibus tempus, ligula nibh congue massa, nec malesuada mi neque sed nulla. Nam sed lorem in nisi facilisis facilisis sollicitudin eu ligula. Etiam diam nunc, placerat tristique ligula non, hendrerit vehicula mi.
Nulla commodo mollis massa sit amet blandit. Sed volutpat gravida dolor, vitae dignissim nulla placerat at. Fusce faucibus auctor fringilla. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Proin sit amet blandit dui. Nullam ex lacus, vulputate ac dolor sed, porta posuere ante. Nulla ipsum urna, cursus sed volutpat ut, cursus nec arcu. Mauris suscipit gravida orci, nec blandit mauris ornare at. Aliquam erat volutpat. Mauris sit amet libero facilisis, fermentum mauris vitae, malesuada ligula. Donec sagittis tempor urna, ac pellentesque metus consectetur eget. Duis facilisis, tellus in hendrerit semper, mi mi cursus velit, fermentum convallis velit elit a urna. Praesent fermentum non tortor vel semper. Integer nibh augue, tincidunt vel aliquet pulvinar, varius vel tortor. Mauris ac diam sed nisl pharetra mattis consequat lacinia sem. Mauris a sem eget sem malesuada aliquet at eget enim.
Proin congue ligula in nunc posuere, ac commodo velit aliquam. Quisque iaculis libero vitae tortor fermentum, ac facilisis dui auctor. Nullam porta mi vitae leo varius scelerisque at sit amet mi. Sed eu euismod massa, sed condimentum neque. Maecenas dapibus nulla id metus bibendum feugiat. Proin in est quam. Donec in ante vel elit tempus commodo. Nunc vel suscipit ex, id suscipit est. Vivamus sodales ex ac quam luctus venenatis. Praesent ornare id urna non luctus. Fusce ac sem gravida dui convallis dignissim a quis nibh. Mauris nec nibh sit amet lacus ullamcorper egestas.
Donec feugiat justo ac molestie varius. Etiam gravida ornare tortor, vestibulum varius eros rhoncus sed. Duis tristique erat at ornare molestie. Duis eleifend tortor eu erat congue, a gravida tortor molestie. Ut molestie, neque eu porttitor condimentum, felis mauris porta nulla, in dapibus tellus massa id justo. Mauris orci mi, pharetra at mauris blandit, consequat dictum orci. Fusce molestie ornare sapien sit amet dignissim. Nunc ac diam tempor, rhoncus justo ut, faucibus velit. Ut ullamcorper ligula nec volutpat dictum. Praesent orci enim, auctor ac viverra at, tempus nec eros. Integer turpis nibh, feugiat nec arcu ac, mollis vulputate nibh. Aenean in bibendum leo, id interdum turpis.
